Crypto Token Value Checker
Check Token Value
Enter token details to see if it makes sense to invest. This tool helps you avoid tokens like Moonft (MTC) that have no real utility, no working platform, and transaction fees higher than the token value.
Token Analysis
Red Flags Identified
Green Flags
There’s a coin called Moonft (MTC) floating around in the crypto space, and if you’ve seen it listed somewhere, you might be wondering: is this real? Is it worth anything? Or is it just another ghost token with no substance? The short answer: Moonft (MTC) is a cryptocurrency with almost no market presence, no verifiable team, and no real utility. It’s not a scam in the traditional sense - it’s more like a ghost town with a fake sign saying "Welcome to the Future of NFTs."
What Moonft (MTC) claims to be
Moonft (MTC) is marketed as the native token of an NFT marketplace. The idea sounds simple enough: buy, sell, and trade NFTs using MTC. The project says it offers features like "Batch shelving," where you can list multiple NFTs in one transaction. Sounds handy, right? But here’s the catch - there’s no working website. No live marketplace. No demo. No screenshots. No videos. Just a few lines of text on CoinGecko and a handful of price trackers listing numbers that don’t match each other.
That’s not how legitimate projects work. Even the smallest successful crypto projects have at least a GitHub repo, a Discord server, or a Twitter account with active users. Moonft has none of that. No GitHub. No Telegram. No Reddit threads. Not even a single user review on Trustpilot or a forum post from someone who actually used it. If this were a real product, you’d find at least one person saying, "I bought an NFT with MTC last week." But you won’t. Because it didn’t happen.
The numbers don’t add up
Let’s look at the numbers - because they’re the clearest sign something’s off.
Moonft has a total supply of 100 million tokens. But only about 330,000 are in circulation. That’s 0.33%. That means over 99% of the tokens are locked up - or worse, never released. Why would a project do that? One reason: to make the market cap look tiny while keeping the "fully diluted valuation" (FDV) inflated. The FDV is calculated as if all 100 million tokens were in circulation. At a price of $0.000015 per token, that gives an FDV of around $1.97 million. But the actual market cap - based on the 330,000 tokens trading - is around $500. That’s a 3,800x difference. That’s not innovation. That’s math designed to trick people into thinking it’s valuable.
Price data is all over the place. CoinGecko says MTC is worth $0.000015. Dropstab.com says $0.001557. LiveCoinWatch says $0.000015. One source says the 24-hour change is +0.24%. Another says +88%. One says trading volume is $779,000. Another says $0.26. These aren’t typos. These are contradictions that show the data is either fake or pulled from a single, low-volume trade on an obscure exchange.
And that exchange? Indodax. That’s it. That’s the only place you can trade MTC - and only for Indonesian Rupiah (IDR). No USD pairs. No EUR. No BTC or ETH. Just IDR. That means you need an Indonesian bank account to buy it. And even then, the volume is so low, you’d be lucky to find a buyer if you wanted to sell.
Why you can’t actually use Moonft
Let’s say you somehow bought 10,000 MTC tokens. At $0.0015 each, that’s $15. Sounds cheap. But here’s the problem: sending one MTC token on Ethereum costs about $1.50 in gas fees. That’s 100 times more than the value of the tokens you’re trying to send. On Solana? Fees are lower - but MTC isn’t even on Solana. It’s on a blockchain nobody knows about. No one has published which chain it runs on. No whitepaper. No technical docs. No contract address you can verify on Etherscan.
Without knowing the blockchain, you can’t add it to MetaMask. Without a contract address, you can’t check if it’s real. Without a website, you can’t even see what the "NFT marketplace" looks like. You’re not investing in a project. You’re betting on a spreadsheet with made-up numbers.
Who’s behind Moonft?
Every real crypto project names its team. Even small ones. Moonft? No names. No LinkedIn profiles. No Twitter handles. No past projects. CoinGecko says it was "built by an experienced team" - but doesn’t say who. That’s not a red flag. That’s a blackout.
Compare that to OpenSea, Blur, or Immutable X. They have CEOs, CTOs, engineers with public profiles, and press coverage. Moonft has silence. And silence in crypto usually means one thing: no one wants to be connected to this.
What the "experts" say (and why you shouldn’t trust them)
You’ll find YouTube videos and blog posts claiming MTC will hit $0.01 by 2025. One source says "Bullish" with a green arrow. Another says "Bearish" with a red one. But here’s the kicker: none of these "analysts" show their work. No charts. No models. No data sources. Just predictions.
Wallet Investor? No one knows who runs it. LiteFinance? A brokerage firm that doesn’t specialize in crypto. 3commas.io? A trading bot platform that aggregates predictions from unknown sources. These aren’t analysts. They’re echo chambers.
And here’s the irony: even though MTC is down 98% against Bitcoin and Ethereum over the last six months, one site still calls it "Bullish." That’s like calling a sinking ship "on an upward trend" because the crew is still waving flags.
How Moonft compares to real NFT tokens
Let’s put this in perspective. OpenSea’s native token (if it had one) would be worth hundreds of millions. Immutable X (IMX) has a market cap over $300 million. Even tiny NFT platforms like Tensor or Magic Eden have market caps in the tens of millions.
Moonft? $500. That’s less than the cost of a decent gaming PC. It’s less than what you’d spend on a few NFTs on OpenSea. And it’s 1/10,000,000th the size of the smallest real NFT project.
If you’re looking to invest in NFT marketplaces, there are dozens of legitimate tokens with real users, real volume, and real teams. Moonft isn’t one of them.
Is Moonft a scam?
It’s not a classic scam like a rug pull - because there’s no evidence anyone ever raised funds or collected money from investors. There’s no ICO. No presale. No wallet full of ETH from buyers. That means no one got rich off this - yet.
But it fits the pattern of a "pump and dump" token designed for low-effort speculation. The structure is textbook: tiny circulating supply, massive max supply, inconsistent data, no team, no product, no community. Chainalysis flagged this exact setup in their 2022 report on pump-and-dump schemes. It’s not illegal - it’s just useless.
People buy it because the price is low. "I can buy 10 million tokens for $15!" they think. But low price doesn’t mean high value. A penny stock isn’t a bargain if the company is bankrupt. Same here.
What should you do?
If you’re thinking of buying MTC: don’t.
If you already own it: don’t expect it to go anywhere. There’s no reason for the price to rise. No demand. No utility. No liquidity. Even if someone tries to pump it, there’s no one to dump it to - because no one else is watching.
If you’re researching NFT tokens: look at platforms with real traffic. Check their trading volume. See if they have a public team. Read their documentation. Look for community engagement. If it’s silent, walk away.
Moonft (MTC) isn’t a crypto coin you invest in. It’s a warning sign. A reminder that not every token with a name is a project. Sometimes, it’s just a number on a screen - and nothing more.
Is Moonft (MTC) a real cryptocurrency?
Moonft (MTC) exists as a token on some price-tracking websites, but it has no functional platform, no verifiable team, no documentation, and no real community. It lacks the basic infrastructure of a legitimate cryptocurrency - so while it technically "exists," it has no practical value or utility.
Can I buy Moonft (MTC) on Coinbase or Binance?
No. Moonft (MTC) is not listed on any major exchange like Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, or KuCoin. The only place it’s traded is Indodax, an Indonesian exchange, and only in MTC/IDR pairs. This makes it nearly impossible for international users to buy or sell.
Why is the price so low?
The price is low because there’s almost no demand. With only 330,000 tokens in circulation and no real use case, buyers are extremely rare. The low price is also designed to make the token seem affordable - but that’s misleading. Transaction fees on major blockchains are hundreds of times higher than the token’s value, making actual use impossible.
Is Moonft (MTC) a good investment?
No. Moonft (MTC) has no foundation for long-term value. It lacks a working product, team, liquidity, and community. The market cap is under $500, and the token’s price is inconsistent across platforms. Any predictions of future growth come from unverified sources with no track record. It’s speculative at best and likely a dead asset.
Why do some websites say Moonft is "Bullish"?
Some sites label Moonft as "Bullish" based on tiny, short-term price spikes - but they ignore the bigger picture. Over the last six months, MTC has lost over 98% of its value against Bitcoin and Ethereum. These "bullish" claims are misleading, often generated by bots or paid promotions, and don’t reflect real market conditions or fundamentals.
Can I use Moonft (MTC) to buy NFTs?
No. There is no functioning NFT marketplace for Moonft. No website, no smart contract, no interface. Even if you owned MTC, you couldn’t use it to purchase anything. The claimed "Batch shelving" feature exists only in marketing text - not in reality.
What happened to the Moonft team?
There is no public information about the team behind Moonft. No names, no profiles, no past projects. The absence of any identifiable developers or founders is a major red flag. Legitimate projects - even small ones - always have some traceable team members. Moonft has none.
Eddy Lust
November 28, 2025 AT 02:17Man, I just scrolled past this and thought it was a meme at first. Like, who even makes a coin with no website and no team? It’s not even a scam-it’s more like a digital ghost story. I’ve seen dead projects with more soul than this. Feels like someone typed ‘NFT marketplace’ into ChatGPT and hit publish without checking if the lights were on.
Christina Oneviane
November 29, 2025 AT 15:53Oh wow, so this is what capitalism looks like when it’s on vacation 🤡💸
Casey Meehan
November 30, 2025 AT 09:15LMAO at the FDV being 3800x the market cap 😂 This isn’t crypto, it’s a math glitch with a Discord server that got deleted. I’d rather hold Monopoly money than this. 🤖📉
Tom MacDermott
November 30, 2025 AT 18:06Wow. Just… wow. You wrote a 10-page essay on a token that doesn’t even have a GitHub repo? I’m impressed you didn’t cry while typing it. Honestly, this reads like a college paper written by someone who’s never traded anything that wasn’t on Binance. You treat crypto like it’s a museum exhibit. Newsflash: most of it’s just digital graffiti. This? It’s street art. Maybe ugly. Maybe pointless. But at least it’s alive.
And don’t get me started on ‘real NFT projects’-OpenSea? Please. They’re a shell company with a VC-funded PR team. You think they’re any more legitimate? At least MTC doesn’t pretend to be anything other than a ghost in the machine.
People buy these tokens because they’re cheap. Not because they’re smart. And that’s the entire point of crypto: to let fools gamble while the smart ones watch. You’re mad because the game isn’t rigged in your favor. It was never meant to be.
Next time, don’t write a eulogy for a token that never had a heartbeat. Write a comedy sketch. At least then, someone might laugh instead of nodding solemnly like you just discovered the meaning of life.
fanny adam
December 2, 2025 AT 06:18Let’s not overlook the geopolitical implications here. Indodax is the sole exchange supporting MTC, and Indonesia has historically been a vector for unregulated token laundering under the guise of retail speculation. The fact that no USD pairs exist is not an accident-it’s a deliberate obfuscation tactic designed to evade SEC jurisdiction and AML monitoring. The 330,000 circulating tokens align precisely with the number of active Indonesian wallets registered between Q3 2022 and Q1 2023, according to Chainalysis’s anonymized data dump. This is not a pump-and-dump. This is a controlled liquidity experiment, likely backed by a shell entity tied to Southeast Asian fintech incubators with ties to offshore banking jurisdictions. The absence of a whitepaper is not negligence-it’s operational security. They are not trying to attract investors. They are testing the resilience of decentralized price discovery in a vacuum. This token is a canary in the coal mine for regulatory arbitrage in the post-2024 global crypto landscape.
Felicia Sue Lynn
December 2, 2025 AT 16:12There’s something quietly poetic about a token that exists only as a number on a screen, with no team, no story, no future-yet still draws curious eyes. It’s like a poem written in invisible ink. We scan it, try to make sense of it, and when we realize there’s nothing there, we feel both foolish and strangely moved. Perhaps that’s the art of it: not in utility, but in the silence it leaves behind. We project meaning onto the void, and in doing so, reveal more about ourselves than about the token. Maybe the real NFT here is the collective human need to believe in something, even when it’s clearly nothing.
Martin Doyle
December 3, 2025 AT 19:10You’re all overthinking this. It’s a shitcoin. That’s it. No team, no product, no future. The only reason it’s still on CoinGecko is because someone uploaded it manually and forgot to delete it. I’ve seen bots auto-list tokens like this on 12 different sites just to inflate search results. If you’re still thinking about buying it, you’re not a crypto investor-you’re a crypto masochist. Just delete the tab and go touch grass. 🌱